A Ray of Hope for Those Seeking Justice
In a significant judgment, the Sikkim High Court has allowed a criminal revision petition, setting aside a lower court’s order and condoning a 388-day delay in filing an appeal. The court’s decision highlights the importance of justice over procedural technicalities, providing relief to those seeking justice.
The Case
The case in question involved a criminal trial in which the accused was convicted and sentenced by a lower court. However, the accused failed to file an appeal within the stipulated time frame, resulting in a delay of 388 days. The accused then filed a criminal revision petition, seeking condonation of the delay and a review of the lower court’s order.
Also Read Women’s Applications Under Domestic Violence Act Can’t be Dismissed Without Inquiry: Karnataka HC
The High Court’s Decision
A division bench of the Sikkim High Court, comprising Justice Meenakshi Madan and Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, heard the petition and observed that the delay was not intentional, but rather due to circumstances beyond the accused’s control. The court noted that the accused had been incarcerated for an extended period and that the delay was largely attributed to the prison authorities’ failure to provide necessary documents.
Condoning the Delay
The court, in its wisdom, condoned the 388-day delay, holding that justice should not be sacrificed at the altar of procedural technicalities. The bench observed that the accused’s right to appeal is a valuable right, and that the delay should not deprive them of this right.
Justice Over Technicalities
The court’s decision is a significant departure from the traditional approach, where delays are often viewed as a sufficient ground for dismissal. Instead, the Sikkim High Court has prioritized justice, recognizing that the accused’s right to appeal is a fundamental right that should not be curtailed by technicalities.
Implications of the Judgment
The judgment has far-reaching implications for those seeking justice in Sikkim. It sets a precedent for courts to prioritize justice over procedural technicalities, providing relief to those who have been denied justice due to delays or other technical grounds.
Reaction from Legal Fraternity
The legal fraternity has welcomed the judgment, hailing it as a landmark decision. “This judgment is a breath of fresh air,” said Advocate General, Satish Kumar. “It recognizes the importance of justice and the need to balance it with procedural requirements.”
Conclusion
The Sikkim High Court’s decision is a significant step towards ensuring that justice is not denied due to technicalities. By condoning the delay and allowing the criminal revision petition, the court has sent a strong message that justice will be prioritized over procedural technicalities. This judgment will have a positive impact on the justice delivery system in Sikkim, providing relief to those seeking justice.