Federal Judge Dismisses Blakeman’s Lawsuit Against State

A federal judge has made a big move against Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman. He threw out Blakeman’s lawsuit against the New York State Attorney General. Blakeman had sued in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New York.

He was trying to stop the state from ending his order. This order banned transgender girls from playing in girls’ sports at over 100 places in the county.

District Court Judge Nusrat Choudhury made the decision. She used to work for the ACLU. She said Blakeman and others can’t stop the Attorney General from fighting the ban.

This is a big loss for Blakeman’s effort to keep the ban. Many LGBTQ+ groups have spoken out against it, calling it “transphobic” and against anti-discrimination laws.

Before this, the county asked for a temporary stop on the lawsuit but got denied. Now, the state can move forward with its own case against the ban. Blakeman says the ban is needed to protect girls’ sports. But many disagree, saying it’s harmful and breaks laws against discrimination.

A Federal Judge’s Ruling on Blakeman’s Legal Battle

A federal judge has made a big decision. She dismissed Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman’s lawsuit against the New York State Attorney General. Judge Nusrat Choudhury, who used to work for the ACLU, said Blakeman’s claims didn’t have enough evidence.

Dismissal of County Executive’s Lawsuit Against Attorney General

Judge Choudhury wrote a 45-page ruling. She said Blakeman’s order was too wide, affecting over 100 sports sites. She also said his use of the 14th Amendment and Title IX was not enough for his case.

Court’s Assessment of Constitutional Violations Claim

Judge Choudhury said the issue is very important. She wants to protect transgender youth in sports. But, she thinks Blakeman’s order was too broad, hurting women and girls’ sports chances.

This decision is a big win for transgender rights supporters. It means everyone, no matter their gender identity, can have equal sports chances. This ruling is key in the debate about transgender athletes in sports.

“The court’s decision to dismiss Blakeman’s lawsuit is a significant victory for advocates of transgender rights, as it upholds the principle of equal opportunities in sports, regardless of gender identity.”

Background: County Executive’s Executive Order

In February 2023, Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman made a big rule. He said sports teams in Nassau County must be labeled as male, female, or coed. This meant transgender female athletes couldn’t play on girls’ or women’s teams.

This rule affected over 100 sports places in Nassau County. It made them follow the rule of using birth sex for labels. LGBTQ+ groups said this broke laws against gender discrimination.

Requirements for Athletic Organizations in Nassau County

Blakeman’s rule said sports groups in Nassau County must do this:

  • Be labeled as male, female, or coed based on birth sex
  • Stop transgender female athletes from playing on girls’ or women’s teams
  • Make sure athletes play on teams that match their birth sex

This rule kept transgender female athletes out of women’s sports in over 100 places. It made LGBTQ+ rights groups and supporters very upset.

Nassau County Executive Order

“The executive order is a blatant violation of state laws protecting the rights of transgender individuals. It’s a harmful and discriminatory policy that has no place in our communities.”

– LGBTQ+ Rights Advocate

State Attorney General’s Cease-and-Desist Order

In March, New York Attorney General Letitia James sent a cease-and-desist letter to Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman. She demanded he take back his order that banned transgender women and girls from county sports. James said Blakeman’s order broke the state’s anti-discrimination laws.

Blakeman ignored the order and decided to fight it in court. This started a big legal fight over transgender rights in sports.

The state’s top law official sent the order right after Blakeman made his ban. His order, from February 22, stopped transgender athletes from playing on girls’ teams in Nassau County’s public places. This affected over 100 sports groups.

Attorney General James called Blakeman’s order “transphobic” and against New York’s anti-discrimination laws. She told him to take back the ban. She warned that not doing so would lead to legal action.

“The County Executive’s order is not only unconstitutional, but it also sends a dangerous message that discrimination against transgender individuals will be tolerated,” said James. “My office will use every tool at our disposal to protect the rights of all New Yorkers.”

Blakeman didn’t give up. He filed a lawsuit in federal court to support his order. This started a long legal fight over transgender athletes in sports. The state and county are now fighting over LGBTQ+ rights.

Cease and Desist Order

The cease-and-desist order from the New York Attorney General made the dispute even bigger. It shows how serious the issue is and the big effects it could have on transgender rights.

a federal judge has dismissed blakeman’s lawsuit against the state

A federal judge has made a big decision. She dismissed a lawsuit by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman. He wanted to stop the state from taking action against his rule. This rule said transgender women and girls couldn’t join girls’ sports at county facilities.

This big win is a key point in the fight over transgender rights in sports. Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury said Nassau County didn’t have the right to sue the New York Attorney General.

Implications of the Court’s Decision

This decision means big things:

  • Blakeman’s rule, affecting over 100 public places in Nassau County, stays in place.
  • The New York Attorney General can now challenge the ban, leading to a bigger fight over transgender rights.
  • This ruling adds to the debate on transgender athletes in women’s and girls’ sports.

Even though Blakeman lost, the fight isn’t over. The New York Civil Liberties Union is fighting for transgender athletes too. They say the ban is unfair and discriminatory.

This case is changing the rules for transgender athletes. The judge’s decision will affect the debate on their rights in sports.

“This ruling is a setback, but we remain committed to protecting the rights of transgender athletes and ensuring that all students have the opportunity to participate in sports in a fair and equitable manner.”

– Statement from the New York Civil Liberties Union

Legal Arguments in Blakeman’s Lawsuit

Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman and a local parent argued in a federal lawsuit. They said the county can protect women and girls in sports by not letting transgender females join girls’ teams. They used the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection clause and Title IX. They claimed transgender athletes would have unfair physical advantages.

A federal judge then threw out Blakeman’s lawsuit. The judge said the county can’t sue the state because of the 11th Amendment. This rule stops a local government from suing a state government in federal courts.

Equal Protection Clause and Title IX Cited

Blakeman’s lawsuit said the county’s order was needed to protect women’s sports. It used the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX. The lawsuit pointed to cases where transgender girls allegedly hurt female athletes in Massachusetts and North Carolina.

But the federal judge ruled against the lawsuit. The judge said the county couldn’t sue the state. This decision supported the state’s view that the order broke New York’s anti-discrimination laws.

“The dismissal of Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman’s lawsuit against State Attorney General Letitia James was a significant victory for transgender rights advocates in New York.”

The challenge against Blakeman’s order has support from the Roller Rebels, an adult women’s roller derby league, and the New York Civil Liberties Union. They say the order breaks New York’s Human Rights Law and Civil Rights Law.

Transgender Rights Advocates’ Response

Juli Grey-Owens of Gender Equality New praised the dismissal of Blakeman’s lawsuit. They called it a “divisive and harmful political move.” This move doesn’t help transgender youth. They say we need inclusive policies and equal chances for transgender athletes.

This dismissal is a win for transgender rights. It helps protect transgender athletes in school sports. Advocates see it as a step towards a supportive environment for all young people.

LGBTQ+ advocates say 24 states have passed laws against trans youth in sports. But, New York has laws that protect transgender people. The Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA) and guidance from the New York State Division of Human Rights stop discrimination based on gender identity.

The roller derby league won a lawsuit using these laws. This shows transgender rights advocates’ commitment to fight against discrimination. With the dismissal of Blakeman’s lawsuit, we move closer to fair sports policies for everyone, no matter their gender identity.

FAQ

What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman against the New York State Attorney General?

A federal judge has thrown out Blakeman’s lawsuit against the state. The judge said Blakeman and others can’t stop the attorney general from fighting the ban on transgender girls in girls’ sports at county facilities.

What was the basis of Blakeman’s lawsuit?

Blakeman and a local parent started a federal lawsuit. They argued the county has a right to protect women and girls in sports. They said banning transgender females from girls’ teams is needed to keep sports fair.They used the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection clause and Title IX. They claimed transgender athletes would have unfair physical advantages.

How did the judge rule on Blakeman’s constitutional claims?

The federal judge dismissed Blakeman’s lawsuit. The judge said the county’s claims didn’t pass the test. The judge believed Blakeman’s rule was too wide, affecting over 100 places in Nassau County.It also stopped women’s and girls’ teams from letting transgender athletes play.

What was the impact of Blakeman’s executive order that banned transgender female athletes from playing on girls’ teams?

Blakeman’s order made sports leagues, teams, and programs in Nassau County label themselves as male, female, or coed. This meant transgender female athletes couldn’t play on girls’ teams in over 100 places in the county.

How did the New York Attorney General respond to Blakeman’s executive order?

In March, New York Attorney General Letitia James sent a cease-and-desist letter to Blakeman. She demanded he take back his order because it broke state anti-discrimination laws. Blakeman ignored the order and took it to court, starting a legal fight.

What are the implications of the court’s decision to dismiss Blakeman’s lawsuit?

The dismissal of Blakeman’s lawsuit means the fight over transgender athletes in women’s and girls’ sports is far from over. Blakeman’s ban is still in place. But the court’s decision lets the New York Attorney General’s office challenge it in court. This could greatly affect the national debate on transgender athletes in sports.

How did transgender rights advocates respond to the dismissal of Blakeman’s lawsuit?

Transgender rights advocates, like Juli Grey-Owens of Gender Equality New, were happy with the dismissal. They called Blakeman’s order a “divisive and harmful political move” that doesn’t support transgender youth. They believe in inclusive policies and equal chances for transgender athletes to create a supportive environment for all young people.

Leave a Comment